Consultant: ‘Annexation Is Financially Viable’ In Monday’s Council Packet


Print This Post  Email This Post

A private contractor for the City of Burien claims that the annexation of the remaining part of North Highline/White Center is “financially viable,” according to the packet for the upcoming Monday (July 18) city council meeting (see p. 87 of the PDF packet here).

The contractor, Berk and Associates, has been hired by the city to study the economic feasibility of annexing what has come to be known as “Area Y.”

“Initial, draft data seems to indicates the (sic) annexation is financially viable, largely because of a sales tax credit offered by the state as an incentive,” reads a statement on page 87 of the packet.

That sales tax credit equals up to $5 million per year for 10 years, paid by the State of Washington.

As many of our Readers may recall, we were the first to question (read our June 3rd post here) whether the city was moving to ‘fast-track’ annexation when we posted a letter signed by Mayor Joan McGilton addressed to the King County Library Board, where she stated:

“…for us and for all our residents, the Burien City Council on Monday agreed to consider the question of annexation within sixty (60) days.”

July 27th will mark the 60-day mark from that letter, which was dated May 27, 2011.

Here’s the text in its entirety from Monday’s packet (download it here, PDF file, p. 87):

PURPOSE/REQUIRED ACTION:
This is part of a series of discussions that began in June when staff informed council it would begin assembling documents relevant to the question of annexing the remaining unincorporated area of North Highline, known as area “Y.” There is no action requested at this time.

BACKGROUND (Include prior Council action & discussion):
Annexation of the so-called “area Y” in the North Highline, including White Center, has a long history that council is well aware of. In short, Burien and Seattle in 2009 agreed to bi-furcate the North Highline Area into two areas; “X” in the south and “Y” in the north. Each city agreed it could advance annexations in adjacent areas without opposition until January 2012. Burien successfully annexed area X in 2010 and that area is now part of Burien. In March 2011, Seattle declared it was not interested in advancing an annexation in area Y but adopted a resolution stating it might at a later date, perhaps February 2012. The resolution also allowed Burien to advance an annexation in area Y if it wished.

Staff is working with a private contractor, Berk and Associates, to study the financial viability of annexing area Y.

Initial, draft data seems to indicates the annexation is financially viable, largely because of a sales tax credit offered by the state as an incentive. The entire study will be available August 1 and presented to council at its meeting that evening. It will not be available for inclusion in the council packet. Staff intends to offer a high-level summary of the document at that meeting, and will return with the authors at your next council meeting, August 15th for a more detailed discussion.

As mentioned previously, while financial data is central to the question of annexation, staff understands it is not the exclusive one and that the policy question is more complex. In an effort to anticipate additional areas of interest, staff continues to solict other lines of questioning council would like us to explore.

The annexation discussion will predictably be iterative and require information to be acquired as talks progress. The intent of this agenda item is simply to continue that discussion and ensure it progresses in as linear a fashion as possible.

Here’s a screenshot of Berk’s initial recommendation:

Click image to see larger version.

Monday night’s City Council meeting is scheduled to start at 7 p.m. at Burien City Hall, located at 400 SW 152nd. Public Commenting usually is at the top of the agenda. For more information, as well as downloadable agendas, packets and minutes of previous meetings, click here to go to the council website.

Print This Post  Email This Post

Comments

6 Responses to “Consultant: ‘Annexation Is Financially Viable’ In Monday’s Council Packet”
  1. disgusted says:

    Does he say who is going to pay for everything when the money from the State runs out?

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Get a clue burien city council says:

    The answer is the city if burien residents

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Get a clue burien city council says:

    This is incredibly shocking!!!! I mean who would have thought that the city hired consultant determined what the city wanted. Even though Seattle came to a completely different conclusion. Shocking!!!!! Truly shocking!!!!!!

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Burienite says:

    While I’m not all that enthused about annexing the remaining area, one thing to keep in mind is the reason Seattle’s numbers didn’t pencil-out is because their services are SO much more expensive. Plus, they offer other services (which they consider base services) beyond what Burien offers. Remeber, the City of Seattle is an extremely large beauracracy, and with that comes an expensive operation.

    As far as Berk and Associates goes, they have been very accurate in their analysis of the financial implications of annexation. Yes, the city hires them to do analysis, but I don’t believe the figures are “cooked” or biased towards any particular decision.

    Again, I’m not an advocate for annexation of the remaining area, but I’m receptive to the study of it at the very least. Those of you who are apposed to it, I would strongly encourage you to attend as many council meetings as possible AND to READ the council meeting packets every week. The council meeting packets contain much information about what is going on in this city.

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Shari says:

      Yes, you’re right— the data are critical and if they’re out there, we should take the time to understand it all. But once we’ve done that, is there a way for current Burien residents to influence the decision other than going to meetings and getting their opinion on the record (not necessarily something all residents can do, schedule wise)… my understanding is that if the council decides to move forward, residents of the potentially annexed area will be asked to vote on whether they would like to join Burien…will existing residents of Burien be asked to vote on the annexation or will we rely on our councilmembers to serve as our proxies?

      Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Tom Taaffe says:

    At the last city council meeting the city manager and two of the councilpeople practically salivated when talking about the experts pending report. Of course the report was top secret. My imagination I guess.
    It is amazing how, in contested matters, experts come to diametrically opposed conclusions based on the same facts. Somehow the opinions of these good men and women of science invariably favor the party who paid them.
    And they give great opinion.

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0