City Council May Vote To Move Forward On N. Highline Annexation Monday


Print This Post  Email This Post

Screenshot of Resolution #323, calling for Annexation of North Highline.

by Ralph Nichols

A resolution calling for annexation by Burien of unincorporated North Highline awaits discussion and possible action by city council members at Monday night’s (Oct. 3) meeting.

It was drafted by city staff at the request of the council, which voted 4-3 Sept. 26 to have the proposal before them for consideration at this meeting.

“The best interests and general welfare of the City of Burien would be served by the annexation of [the] contiguous unincorporated territory,” the resolution reads in part.

“The City council hereby calls for an election to be held” in which voters in North Highline would decide if they want this area to become part of Burien.

“All the significant, material information on this subject has been presented and discussed,” City Manager Mike Martin said in his introduction to the discussion in Monday’s city council packet.

Martin “encourages the council to adopt the resolution that would advance the annexation of the North Highline Area.”

If city members approve the controversial resolution, either at Monday’s meeting or at a later date, staff will file a notice of intent to annex with the King County Boundary Review Board, and also notify the King County Council.

Should the Boundary Review Board accept the city’s proposal, the council would then set an election date. Under state law, only residents of the unincorporated area are allowed to vote on annexation.

Councilman Gerald Robison introduced the motion for an annexation resolution at the Sept. 26 meeting following the latest council discussion that included questions as well as comments from the public.

Mayor Joan McGilton, Councilwoman Rose Clark, and Councilman Gordon Shaw also supported the motion.

Deputy Mayor Brian Bennett, Councilman Jack Block Jr., and Councilwoman Lucy Krakowiak voted no.

Speculation on how the annexation vote could go ranges from 4-3 or even 5-2 to proceed, to 4-3 against the motion.

Krakowiak has repeatedly stated her opposition to annexing the remaining unincorporated area, after earlier opposing the annexation of what is now North Burien.

Bennett said Sept. 26 he hopes to see annexation take place but that it may be too soon. Block also said he would like an eventual annexation but that the process is being rushed. Block raised several issues he said need to be resolved first.

One point of concern, even for some council members who favor annexation, is the reliability of a sales tax credit, approved by the 2009 Legislature, which would transfer $5 million annually to Burien for 10 years if it annexes North Highline.

At that meeting, Martin told council members that even if they approve the annexation resolution now, they can back away from it, should circumstances change, at any time before residents of the unincorporated area vote on it.

The council packet (download PDF here) includes answers to these questions by Berk Consulting, which earlier this year prepared a financial analysis of the proposed annexation for the city, along with information about tax exempt property in North Highline and how human services are delivered there.

Here’s the text of the Resolution in its entirety (download PDF of Monday’s council packet here; Agenda Bill is p. 53, and Resolution is on p. 70):

CITY OF BURIEN, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 323
______________________________________________________________________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURIEN, WASHINGTON, CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BURIEN LYING IN AN AREA EAST AND SOUTH OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES, THEN GENERALLY WEST OF A LINE FOLLOWING 12TH AVENUE S. (IF EXTENDED) BETWEEN S. CAMBRIDGE ST. AND S. 96TH ST., THEN SOUTH OF S. 96TH ST., BETWEEN 12TH AVENUE S. AND SR-99, THEN SOUTH ALONG SR-99 TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA CORPORATE BOUNDARIES, THEN SOUTH ALONG THE CITY OF TUKWILA CORPORATE BOUNDARIES TO THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF BURIEN, REFERENCED AS THE NORTH HIGHLINE ANNEXATION AREA.
_______________________________________________________________________________

WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act and the King County Countywide Planning Policies encourage transition of unincorporated urban and urbanizing areas within Potential Annexation Areas from county governance to city governance; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Burien, Washington, has determined that it would be in the best interest and general welfare of the City of Burien and the North Highline Unincorporated Area to annex certain property lying in an area north of existing City of Burien corporate boundary, referenced as the proposed “Burien Annexation” and shown on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Burien Annexation area is within the City of Burien’s Potential Annexation Area adopted pursuant to Burien City Council Ordinance No. 455; and

WHEREAS, the City of Burien, City of Seattle, King County, Fire District 2 and Fire District 11 have completed mediation to resolve overlapping Potential Annexation Areas as called for in King County Countywide Planning Policy LU-32; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Burien Annexation is consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding for North Highline Annexation dated December 4, 2008; and

WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous to call for an election for this annexation;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURIEN, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Findings. The above findings are true and correct in all respects and are incorporated as though fully set forth herein.

Section 2. Additional Findings. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Burien would be served by the annexation of contiguous unincorporated territory lying in an area east and south of the City of Seattle corporate boundaries, then generally west of a line following 12th Avenue S. (if extended) between S. Cambridge St. and S. 96th St., then south of S. 96th St., between 12th Avenue S. and SR-99, then south along SR-99 to the City of Tukwila corporate boundaries, then south along the City of Tukwila corporate boundaries to the corporate boundaries of the City of Burien as shown on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.

Section 3. Number of Voters. As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the aforesaid territory is .

Section 4. Call for Election. The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held pursuant to Chapter 35A.14 RCW to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for annexation.

Section 5. Assessment and Taxation Rate. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property located within the City of Burien is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Burien, which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to or existing at the date of annexation.

Section 6. Cost of Election. The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of Burien.

Section 7. Certified Copy to be Filed. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of County Commissioners of King County, Washington and with the King County Boundary Review Board.

Section 8. Notice of Intention to be Filed. The City Clerk shall also file with the King County Boundary Review Board a Notice of Intention hereof as required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq.

ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURIEN, WASHINGTON, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF THIS ____ DAY OF _____, 2011.
______
CITY OF BURIEN

We’re curious to hear what our Readers think – please take our Poll below, or leave a Comment:

Should the City Council adopt or reject 'Resolution 323,' calling for Annexation of North Highline?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Print This Post  Email This Post

Comments

15 Responses to “City Council May Vote To Move Forward On N. Highline Annexation Monday”
  1. NO__NO!! says:

    WE DON’T WANT TO BE IN BURIEN!

    NO WAY!

    NO__NO__NO!

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. TcB says:

    This is calling for an election. People are not understanding this and freaking out.

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. mike says:

    I have said no annexation in the past. I say no now. I don’t want higher taxes. King County does just fine with the services they provide. Why spend the money to have an election.

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Bobby Leon says:

      Mike King County has stated that they do not want to be in the land business. They are cutting services to the unincorporated areas. Before long you will not be happy with the lack of services you wil be receiving from King County. The choice is going to be Seattle or Burien if you think Seattle, you better take a look at the taxes you pay in Seattle. I was in the last annex to Burien and I have not seen any signifcant increase in my taxes.

      Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Richard says:

    The Burien City Council needs to concentrate their efforts on improving our existing cities’ problems. Saying “no” to annexation is a no-brainer.

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • elizabeth2 says:

      Exactly! We (including the council) need to put ALL our energy into getting Burien back on its feet. We do not need to adopt any more problems and challenges right now. I hope that the council takes heed of what its citizens are saying (since there is no vote for the residents of Burien) and just says NO!

      Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Funny Burien says:

        The majority of residents have advised the council (since we are represented by them) and have said go forth. If you are against annexation let them know as well as the blog.

        Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • Funny Burien says:

          If you are both against annexation you should tell the council tonight , during public comment. If you don’t they will hear me say yes go forth. This is how represented government works. if you’re not there you cede your power to me!

          Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. mike says:

    The way i read it is the City of Burien will charge an additional tax of 1.39/thousand dollar of assessed value. A $300k house would get an additional bill for about $417. That may not be significant to you buts its real money to me. I don’t want higher taxes. Period. Seattle doesn’t want the area, so the way I see it the County will keep it. The Council just see’s the $5M annually and can’t wait to get their paws on it and spend, spend, spend. Thanks anyway Bobby.

    Rate: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0