LETTER: Former Burien Councilmember: ‘Why I’m voting yes for schools Nov. 8’


Print This Post  Email This Post

[EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is a Letter to the Editor, written by a Reader. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The B-Town Blog nor its staff:]

Why I’m voting yes for schools Nov. 8:

As a member of Highline’s Capital Facilities Advisory Committee (CFAC), I have spent the past year on a mission: To address overcrowding in the Highline School District and ensure good, safe schools for all students. That’s why I am urging you to vote yes on Proposition 1, which will appear on the Nov. 8 general election ballot

Enrollment in Highline schools has increased by 1,500 students in the past five years alone, with no slowdown in sight. After a thorough study, our committee created Proposition 1. It’s a smart, efficient, long-term approach that prioritizes our most urgent needs and tackles the problem in three phases, to help keep costs down for taxpayers.

Proposition 1 was created by CFAC, a group of 40 parents, community members, business owners and neighbors, not by politicians. It is supported by the Highline School Board because it reflects what individual schools need at the neighborhood level, designed by people who know best.

This bond measure provides additional classroom space so our children have the best opportunities to learn, and make room for lower class sizes. We will build a new Highline High School, a new middle school, and a new elementary school for Des Moines. Proposition 1 includes money to design new schools at Evergreen, Tyee and Pacific, so we can build them more quickly and efficiently in the next phase.

All students across the district will benefit from safety improvements, including centralized locks and improved surveillance cameras. Aging schools do not meet modern fire or earthquake codes and lack technology to monitor people coming and going. This measure will address those safety and security concerns.

Proposition 1 saves money in the long run by dealing with problems now when they are cheaper to fix. If we pass it, the state will provide matching funds. The timing of this bond proposition is a win-win for taxpayers.

It’s clear that voter-approved bonds are the only way to build schools. Bonds are financed over 20 years and must overlap to keep up with instructional needs, growth and security.

This bond will reduce overcrowding and address safety issues, while keeping costs down for taxpayers. Delaying hurts kids and costs taxpayers more in the long run.

Good schools benefit the whole community. Join me in voting yes on Proposition 1 Nov. 8.

– Rose Clark
Capital Facilities Advisory Committee member
Yes for Highline campaign volunteer, Highline Public Schools
Former Burien City Councilmember

[Have an opinion or concern you’d like to share with our ~80,000+ monthly Readers? Please send us your Letter to the Editor via email. Include your full name, please cite your sources, remain civil and – pending our careful review – we’ll consider publishing it.]

Print This Post  Email This Post

Comments

One Response to “LETTER: Former Burien Councilmember: ‘Why I’m voting yes for schools Nov. 8’”
  1. Scott salzer says:

    While I truly appreciate your comments and concern for the increase in student population, I have a big problem with priorities. There are schools, like Highline, that have recently been “refurbished” but they get priority over schools that need a lot of basic maintenance work just to be safe and continue to provide a good / workable learning environment. And, correct me if I am wrong, but Seahurst was rebuilt a number of years ago and then went through another refurbishment.

    Why can’t the Highline school district hire an architect that can come up with “semi” module plan that could be adapted to the actual site conditions rather than design every school, at great expense? Seems to me that would be a more cost effective route than designing every school, new & unique. That certainly does not mean that the schools will not be “unique” but, they will have a different footprint.

    Of course, the District, likes to spend, in my opinion, way too much money on designs that do not meet the budget. Marvitsta, many year back, was an example. There were X dollars to spend, came in over budget. Back to the consultant, more dollars, does this make any sense?

    Good luck with the bond, Highline, I am on the fence. You need to convince to vote for this bond – start working on that.

    Rate: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 4