City Keeps Mike Martin On, Requires Amended Contract
The Burien City Council imposed on Monday (May 11th) strict â€œalcohol-related conditionsâ€ with which City Manager Mike Martin must â€œcomply fullyâ€ if he is to retain that position. Martin is scheduled to be arraigned in King County District Court Friday on a charge of driving under the influence of alcohol.
The conditions are included in an amendment to Martinâ€™s contract (download and view PDF here), which was approved without discussion with a 6-1 vote by city lawmakers. Councilwoman Lucy Krakowiak, who publicly called for Martinâ€™s ouster following his arrest for allegedly driving under the influence, cast the dissenting vote. She also cast the lone vote against Martin when the council hired him as city manager in January 2007.
Here’s a portion of the amended contract â€“ click to view the entire document:
Martin, 55, was arrested after a minor traffic accident on April 19 in which his car left the road and hit a yard planter. The King County Sheriffâ€™s deputy who made the arrest said Martinâ€™s breath smelled of alcohol at the time. He was formally charged with DUI by the King County Prosecutorâ€™s office on May 6th.
Martin, who told the deputy that he had had a couple of glasses of wine and two beers, refused to perform field sobriety tests or take a Breathalyzer test when he was arrested. As a result, his driverâ€™s license was suspended when formal DUI charges were filed, as required by state law.
Refusal to take a Breathalyzer test results in the automatic suspension of a driverâ€™s license for one year, although motorists may seek reinstatement of driving privileges if they have an alcohol-ignition interlock device â€“ which prevents an engine from starting if they have been drinking alcohol â€“ installed in their vehicle.
In agreeing to the addition of alcohol-related conditions to his contract, Martin denied committing â€œany wrongful or criminal act,â€ but acknowledged â€œthat the facts and circumstances of his arrest may constitute â€˜causeâ€™ to terminate his employment under the Orginal Agreement.â€
The council, in turn, recognized â€œthe excellent performanceâ€ of Martin over the past 2Â½ years and opted to retain him as city manager if he agreed to the additional conditions. Burien Mayor Joan McGilton and Martin signed the amended contract on Monday.
Under the terms of Martinâ€™s amended contract, he â€œwill not report to work at the city or remain at work or on duty while under the influence of alcohol,â€ which is defined as a blood alcohol level of .02 percent or above.
Martin is required to submit to random alcohol testing without prior notice to ensure compliance with this condition. In addition, he is to submit to alcohol testing at the request of the mayor (or deputy mayor in the mayorâ€™s absence) and one other council member if there is a good-faith â€œarticulated suspicion by any person that the manager has reported to work or remained at work under the influence of alcohol.â€
He also must apply for and install at his own expense an ignition-interlock device on any vehicle that he drives to or from work or while on the job. Each interlock device is to remain in use for two years.
And Martin is required to undergo alcohol assessment and â€œcomply with any treatment recommendationsâ€ that are made.
He is to meet quarterly with council members in executive session â€œto affirm his complianceâ€ with all conditions. Failure to comply with any of them will result in his termination. In two years, the council will review with him the additional requirements to determine if they still are needed.
In October 2005, Martin resigned from a top administrative position with the City of Kent after a hit-and-run accident that he admitted to causing. He paid a $1,025 fine, underwent alcohol-abuse assessment, and attended a victim-impact alcohol and drug panel for that incident.
On April 19th, after Martin was arrested, he was driven home by a sheriffâ€™s deputy â€“ prompting some citizens to ask The B-Town Blog if the city manager had received preferential treatment.
But the answer, according to several law enforcement agencies, is no.
Washington State Patrol public information officer Daniel Coon said how motorists arrested for DUI are handled depends on each county. If a county can take an individual into its jail, they may be booked into the facility. But â€œif there is no room at the inn, so to speak,â€ a driver may be released after the car is impounded and taken to a location where they can sober up. This sometimes involves taking the driver home.
Here’s a video that explains how ignition-interlock devices work:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qpl270Qre4M
So…what do YOU think? Please take our poll below: